This time for a change I have taken a Tamil heading cause nothing else can describe the below story better(Sarcasm intended), We Indians are proud about our family traditions and values and are known to keep family as priority but now( now meaning past 3 months ) there is someone in this country who is breaking these values and traditions. Yes, the Sheena Bora case, the case that made us think is this happening in India? According to me this is one of the worst cases ever that our country has witnessed. So, coming back to the topic, the meaning of the heading goes like " A good family is like a university " so is this family like a university? Yes, it is like a university and the name of the university should be " How to get away with murder". Though many news channels have said to brought light to this story the person who actually put the disco lights on this is Shyam rai , driver of Mrs Indrani Mukerjea, was arrested in an unrelated case of possession of illegal arms in August. Three years after the crime was committed! Brutal murder of an innocent soul who was in love.
There is a jovial way of saying that this murder was committed and trust me it can be used as a riddle, puzzle, tongue twister Etc. I know it will be tough but please try to follow " A 2nd wife of her 3rd husband is charged along with her 2nd husband of killing her daughter from her 1st husband who was having an affair with her 3rd husband's son from his 1st wife" (Phew!) Now just think about this in terms of a family tree! Yeah, i know, unimaginable !! Now, I know this is a 3 months old case and Indians (most of us) know about this case so, no point in kindling over how it happened or how could she kill her own daughter, these questions have become boring rather you won't get any answer for this! So, why am i bringing this now? The case has questions but no one has a single clue about the answers! We all look towards the media for answers who are only doing what they are best at... speculation! So, here in this post I'm trying to give an answer from a public point of view or in other words my version of speculating things. My background for this is very poor, i'm no criminologist nor have I studied law but I have seen 'n' number of Hollywood movies, read a few crime books and have seen loads of mystery tv shows ( Except CID that comes on Sony). There are a few questions but since most of them have been answered, I will take the three most important questions when you look into a murder which are still not answered
Q1. When and where was the victim murdered ? Is there any witnesses ? Forensic reports from crime scene?
Firstly, The victim (Sheena) had disappeared since April 24th, 2012, There was no missing person report, since the so called mom was the killer there is no doubt why it was not filed. Murder actually took place in Mumbai and then taken to raigad or kidnapped in Mumbai and murdered at raigad, By the looks of it the rented car is the crime scene and not the place where the remains was found. The part that makes this case worse is that there are no witnesses. The remains found in raigad was that of Sheena's but there is no other DNA there at the woods and also the body was burnt.
Q2. What is the motive? Why would anyone want her dead?
Behind every murder there is a motive, If a human had to kill someone then there has to be a motive, even a psychopathic killer has a motive or a reason, here one doesn't know who has a greater motive or is the motive still under wraps, as far as I see everyone has a motive except for the driver, he definitely is an accessory for this murder. The three main people who have motives are Indrani , Sanjeev and Peter! Indrani, cause everything about sheena and indrani was a lie let it be calling her sister or keeping sheena from her actual life, Sanjeev does not have any clear motive as he is no way related to sheena or rahul , but there is an allegation of financial aid to sanjeev from indrani, money is the biggest motive when it comes to a murder, maybe he was not the killer but an accessory like the driver, Peter had definite motive, he being the Media Tycoon and this incestuous revelation if got out would have spoilt his name along with his dignity making him also the suspect.
Q3. How many suspects and which motive looks nastier ?
Keeping the driver only as an accessory there are 3 suspects and all three could be guilty, the person who was not in the scene was Peter(According to the Driver and the phone calls made ), but he was in constant touch indrani which rules out the possibility that he didn't know about the murder. He definitely knew and Indrani was in this from the beginning , keeping the financial angle and Sanjeev being in constant touch with Indrani and his flying records on the day of the disappearance he was in the scene... There are three equally nasty suspects, so who is the killer? This is where the speculations happen, so from a public point of view, Sheena was getting out of hand with this incestuous relation with rahul which angered Peter and Indrani meanwhile Indrani talks to peter about how Sanjeev is in need of money. Peter and Indrani together plan or peter had seeded this idea in Indrani of killing her own daughter and she had no other option but to take the help of Sanjeev in return of financial aid to kill Sheena with the help of her driver shyam rai.
In whichever angle I see both Indrani and peter are guilty and most likely to be the killers. As speculations keep coming from all angles let's see what the CBI finds out and hope it does not make it to be another Aarushi talwar case!!
Let the truth prevail!
There is a jovial way of saying that this murder was committed and trust me it can be used as a riddle, puzzle, tongue twister Etc. I know it will be tough but please try to follow " A 2nd wife of her 3rd husband is charged along with her 2nd husband of killing her daughter from her 1st husband who was having an affair with her 3rd husband's son from his 1st wife" (Phew!) Now just think about this in terms of a family tree! Yeah, i know, unimaginable !! Now, I know this is a 3 months old case and Indians (most of us) know about this case so, no point in kindling over how it happened or how could she kill her own daughter, these questions have become boring rather you won't get any answer for this! So, why am i bringing this now? The case has questions but no one has a single clue about the answers! We all look towards the media for answers who are only doing what they are best at... speculation! So, here in this post I'm trying to give an answer from a public point of view or in other words my version of speculating things. My background for this is very poor, i'm no criminologist nor have I studied law but I have seen 'n' number of Hollywood movies, read a few crime books and have seen loads of mystery tv shows ( Except CID that comes on Sony). There are a few questions but since most of them have been answered, I will take the three most important questions when you look into a murder which are still not answered
Q1. When and where was the victim murdered ? Is there any witnesses ? Forensic reports from crime scene?
Firstly, The victim (Sheena) had disappeared since April 24th, 2012, There was no missing person report, since the so called mom was the killer there is no doubt why it was not filed. Murder actually took place in Mumbai and then taken to raigad or kidnapped in Mumbai and murdered at raigad, By the looks of it the rented car is the crime scene and not the place where the remains was found. The part that makes this case worse is that there are no witnesses. The remains found in raigad was that of Sheena's but there is no other DNA there at the woods and also the body was burnt.
Q2. What is the motive? Why would anyone want her dead?
Behind every murder there is a motive, If a human had to kill someone then there has to be a motive, even a psychopathic killer has a motive or a reason, here one doesn't know who has a greater motive or is the motive still under wraps, as far as I see everyone has a motive except for the driver, he definitely is an accessory for this murder. The three main people who have motives are Indrani , Sanjeev and Peter! Indrani, cause everything about sheena and indrani was a lie let it be calling her sister or keeping sheena from her actual life, Sanjeev does not have any clear motive as he is no way related to sheena or rahul , but there is an allegation of financial aid to sanjeev from indrani, money is the biggest motive when it comes to a murder, maybe he was not the killer but an accessory like the driver, Peter had definite motive, he being the Media Tycoon and this incestuous revelation if got out would have spoilt his name along with his dignity making him also the suspect.
Q3. How many suspects and which motive looks nastier ?
Keeping the driver only as an accessory there are 3 suspects and all three could be guilty, the person who was not in the scene was Peter(According to the Driver and the phone calls made ), but he was in constant touch indrani which rules out the possibility that he didn't know about the murder. He definitely knew and Indrani was in this from the beginning , keeping the financial angle and Sanjeev being in constant touch with Indrani and his flying records on the day of the disappearance he was in the scene... There are three equally nasty suspects, so who is the killer? This is where the speculations happen, so from a public point of view, Sheena was getting out of hand with this incestuous relation with rahul which angered Peter and Indrani meanwhile Indrani talks to peter about how Sanjeev is in need of money. Peter and Indrani together plan or peter had seeded this idea in Indrani of killing her own daughter and she had no other option but to take the help of Sanjeev in return of financial aid to kill Sheena with the help of her driver shyam rai.
In whichever angle I see both Indrani and peter are guilty and most likely to be the killers. As speculations keep coming from all angles let's see what the CBI finds out and hope it does not make it to be another Aarushi talwar case!!
Let the truth prevail!
